RSM Tenon, the UK's biggest bankruptcy adviser, is having to renegotiate its own survival with 10% shareholder Lloyds Banking Group just four months after agreeing an increase in its borrowings.
Tenon shares plunged 9% on its half-year results to 5.76p, putting a market value of £58 million on the UK's seventh-largest and only quoted accountant.
Lloyds was granted a warrant over 9.99% of the shares after it granted Tenon new facilities of £93m last October, an increase from £88m, as the group reported a £10m full-year increase in debt to £78m. Debt has now risen to £80.4m.
Tenon said it had made "huge progress", with the underlying operating loss cut from £10.9m a year ago to £600,000 and the pre-tax loss from £83m to £7.5m.
But the group said its cost and headcount reductions had impacted on revenues, down by £9.8m at £88.4m, and therefore its "tightly drawn" banking arrangements. It said: "The covenants and other terms of the facility tighten over time, particularly in the second half of the 2014 financial year, and were set on the basis of a larger business than we have now."
It said the group had entered into discussions with Lloyds to avert the significant risk of a facility breach over the next 12 months.
"While to date Lloyds has not agreed to this reset, we remain in positive dialogue with the bank and Lloyds has confirmed that it continues to be supportive of the continuation of the group as a going concern."
The half-year accounts also show a £14.9m provision for professional indemnity costs, including £11m for live cases, suggesting that RSM Tenon anticipates an upsurge in client claims against the company.
The group said £5.8m of its revenue slide was due to market conditions in audit, tax and advisory, lower new business wins for financial management against the background of the new fee-charging regime, and continued downward pressure on revenues in the insolvency and restructuring market.
The Herald reported on Monday how RSM Tenon had invited clients of its closed-down tax avoidance business, Premier Strategies, to consider settling potential tax liabilities.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article