A £320 MILLION plan to expand Aberdeen harbour into Nigg Bay could be worth nearly £1 billion a year to the Scottish economy, according to a report, writes Tim Sharp.
Aberdeen Harbour Board wants to create a second harbour, featuring up to 1500 metres of deep water berths, south of its existing facilities. But research commissioned by Scottish Enterprise has warned that it requires an improved roads network to have the maximum economic impact.
Midlothian-based BiGGAR Economics calculated that if the new harbour is developed as planned, then in 20 years time it will contribute £2bn in gross value added terms to the economy each year and support around 15,510 jobs, around 30% more than its current impact.
No development sees a reduction in oil and gas business as Norwegian ports benefit at Aberdeen harbour's expense and its contribution will be £1.1bn GVA to the Scottish economy each year, £500m less than at present, with 8350 jobs.
Failing to improve the road network around Nigg would reduce its economic impact by around £600m a year and cut the jobs total to 11,365, the report claimed.
The Scottish Government has named the Nigg Bay development as one of 14 projects it considers to be of national importance.
Aberdeen Harbour Board chief executive Colin Parker said: "Our mission is to create a harbour that is fit for purpose for future generations, and which truly reflects our customers' needs. We believe that a second harbour at Nigg Bay would fulfil both of these requirements."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article