WEIR Group chief executive Keith Cochrane saw his pay for last year fall by more than half after a drop in profits at the Glasgow-based pumps specialist.
Weir Group's annual report published yesterday evening revealed the former Stagecoach chief executive received nearly £1.7 million for the 53 weeks to January 4. This compared to £3.4m for the 12 months to December 31, 2012.
Mr Cochrane took £718,750 in basic pay with another £21,656 in benefits, including life insurance, private medical cover and a £17,000 car allowance.
But his annual bonus was slashed to £108,750 from £568,584 the previous year because Weir announced a 5% fall in underlying pre-tax profits to £418m for the year. This was below the £425m threshold for financial performance, which accounted for 80% of the potential annual bonus.
Of the remaining 20% of the possible bonus, which was obtainable through personal performance, Mr Cochrane achieved 10%.
Of the resulting £108,750 pay-out, 30% was given in shares, which he is restricted from selling for the next three years.
Mr Cochrane reaped £820,417 from long-term incentive schemes, against nearly £2.1m the previous year.
He had the opportunity to receive the equivalent of 100% of salary from a performance share scheme plus a similar amount from a matching share scheme.
While earnings growth has been strong over the past three years, the company failed to meet share price targets, so only 42.8% of Mr Cochrane's share award vested and is available for him to sell.
Last year, Weir's equipment orders were hit by weakness in the minerals market and oversupply in the US fracking sector. But the impact was muted by strong after-sales.
Mr Cochrane joined Weir as finance director in July 2006 and was appointed chief executive in November 2009.
Following a number of years with Arthur Andersen, Mr Cochrane joined rail and bus group Stagecoach in 1993 and rose to be chief executive in 2000. But he left two years later as it struggled in the US.
He was returned to corporate life at ScottishPower in 2003, where he became finance director.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article