HOTELS in Glasgow achieved higher occupancy than those in Edinburgh, Aberdeen or Inverness last year, a survey has revealed.
But the year-on-year percentage rise in hotel revenues was much smaller in Glasgow than in the other three Scottish cities for which survey compiler BDO provides figures.
Occupancy in the Glasgow hotel sector came in at 79% last year, up from 77.8% in 2012. This enabled Glasgow to overtake Aberdeen, which had enjoyed the highest occupancy in 2012.
The survey, which covers a range of three and four-star properties and was published yesterday by accountancy firm BDO, shows revenue per available room (revpar) for the hotel sector in Glasgow last year was up 3% on 2012 at £47.87.
Revpar, or rooms yield, is calculated by multiplying occupancy by the average room rate achieved.
Occupancy in Aberdeen hotels, which continue to be boosted by the strength of the oil and gas industry, dipped to 77.3% last year, from 78.4% in 2012.
However, a rise in room rates enabled hotels in Aberdeen to achieve revpar of £70.23 last year, up 16.4% on 2012's £60.32 for 2012.
Edinburgh also overtook Aberdeen in terms of occupancy. The hotel sector in the Scottish capital raised occupancy to 77.7% last year, from 74.5% in 2012.
Revpar for the Edinburgh hotel sector came in at £61.36 last year, up 9.2% on 2012.
Inverness's hotel sector achieved a rise in occupancy, from 74.9% in 2012 to 77.1% last year. Revpar for Inverness hotels was up 7.4% on 2012 at £44.93.
The Scottish hotel sector achieved an occupancy rate of 75.5% last year, up from 73.2% in 2012. Its revpar was up by 8.2% on 2012 at £52.62.
For hotels in England, outside London, occupancy rose to 71.9% last year from 69.4% in 2012, with revpar up 2.4% at £41.98 last year.
BDO partner Alastair Rae said: "Glasgow performed well with the highest occupancy in Scotland but with 3% revenue growth over the year, which indicates discounting may be occurring to maintain volume."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article