The boss of oil and gas explorer BG has resigned after less than 18 months in the job.
Chris Finlayson cited personal reasons for his departure, which came three days before the company is due to present first quarter figures.
BG's shares have fallen in recent weeks after it slashed production targets due to continued problems in Egypt, where too much of its gas has been diverted into the domestic market instead of being exported.
Mr Finlayson took on the role from Sir Frank Chapman, who had been in charge since BG was created in 1997 when British Gas demerged into two separately listed companies.
BG said chairman Andrew Gould will take the helm on an interim basis as the company begins the search for an external successor.
Mr Gould said the board remained fully committed to the group's strategy based around a portfolio of "high-quality" assets.
He added: "The company must accelerate the creation and delivery of the longer-term value for our shareholders, while delivering the group's business plans.
"The board felt that it was in the best interests of the group to accept Chris's resignation and seek fresh leadership to deliver both of these priorities."
Mr Finlayson has more than 35 years experience in the oil and gas industry, having joined BG from Royal Dutch Shell in 2010. He was previously in charge of BG's capital projects programme.
BG, which employs 5,000 staff in 20 countries, has key growth projects in Brazil and Australia but its growing asset base has led to higher unit operating costs.
Its shares fell by more than 3% today after Mr Finlayson's departure and the company's updated guidance that production will be towards the lower end of expectations due to the ongoing issues in Egpyt.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article