We were left feeling frustrated on Friday when the much-heralded flotation of over-50s insurance and holidays group Saga proved something of a damp squib for thousands of small investors.
We had applied for a nominal £2000 worth of the shares for our 2013 portfolio but were allocated just £740 and were further disappointed when the price managed only a tiny premium in early stock market trading.
It was a far cry from last year's Royal Mail flotation when the share price jumped 38% by the end of the first day's trading.
But Saga advisers reckon they have done a far better job for the company and its longer term prospects on the stock market by favouring its existing customers and major financial institutions at the expense of market speculators.
We still believe the share price will record a reasonable gain in the coming weeks.
Most of our other share tips did little more than tread water last week, although fuel distribution group DCC shares shot up more than £2 after a reassuring trading statement and jewellery group Signet sparkled with a similar gain ahead of its merger with a US rival.
However, Marks & Spencer continued to slide after its lack-lustre trading figures, while recent strong performers Dialight and Smart Metering Systems ran into profit-taking, reducing the total value of our 2014 portfolio by just more than 2% over the week.
We were also disappointed by a further slip in Argos stores group Home Retail, ejected from the 2011 portfolio at its published stop/loss target. But that loss was more than balanced by gains elsewhere and the portfolio recorded a gain of more than £5000 for the first time, raising hopes it will reach our 10% appreciation target by the end of the year.
The 2013 portfolio also recorded a small overall gain although the 2012 selection shaded 1%.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article