The AA was valued at £1.4 billion today before enduring the same lacklustre stock market debut as former sister company Saga.
The motoring organisation, which has four million members, priced its shares at 250p in a flotation which has led to the exit of its private equity owners and allowed the company to raise £184.7 million.
Control of the business has passed to a management buy-in team led by former Green Flag boss Bob Mackenzie and backed by institutional investors including Aviva and Legal & General.
In conditional dealings, the stock fell as low as 231p in a performance echoing last month's sale of shares in over-50s holidays and insurance company Saga, which was also part of Acromas Holdings.
Saga and the AA were combined in a £6.2 billion deal at the height of the credit boom in 2007 to form Acromas, owned by private equity firms CVC, Permira, and Charterhouse. The business was funded by £4.8 billion of bank debt.
Saga recently began trading on the London stock market with a value of around £2 billion but shares are 15p lower than their opening price of 185p, having earlier been priced at the bottom end of expectations.
The AA offer was oversubscribed, allowing Acromas to sell all of its holding and the company to raise funds towards reducing its £3 billion debt pile.
AA chief executive Chris Jansen said: "We are delighted that we have seen such strong demand for shares in AA plc.
"It is no doubt driven by a combination of the core strengths of the business and the expectation of what we can do with the business in the future.
"Everyone at the AA is delighted that we will soon be a public company and we are all looking forward to the next chapter in our 109 year history."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article