Balfour Beatty shares slumped today after the infrastructure services firm warned of a £35 million shortfall within part of its UK construction arm.
It now plans to review the size and footprint of the mechanical and electrical engineering operation, having seen a further deterioration in its performance.
Shares were more than 12% lower as the update spooked investors just two months after Balfour issued a profits warning as well as the departure of chief executive Andrew McNaughton.
Balfour blamed design changes, project delays, rework on projects and contractual disputes for the latest downturn in engineering services.
It plans to offset the shortfall through the proceeds of selling more of its public private partnership projects over the rest of this year.
The rest of Balfour is trading in line with expectations and the group said it remains on track for profits of between £145 million and £160 million.
A 12 to 18 month programme is working to restore the wider UK construction arm to a firmer footing, with the regional and major project businesses trading in line with hopes.
The troubled engineering services business, which is based in Cheadle, has worked on projects including Marks & Spencer's flagship store at Cheshire Oaks and the aquatics centre at the London 2012 Olympics site.
A new management team in engineering services has led to greater scrutiny of contract positions and contributed to the additional £35 million shortfall. Most of it relates to a small number of existing contracts, mainly in the London area.
Balfour said: "Given these issues, we are reviewing the size and geographic footprint of the business with the aim of ensuring a smaller, more focussed business."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article