CHALLENGER banks have been freed to create more competition in the industry and boost SME lending, the new regulators have claimed.
The Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority said last year's reforms to lower barriers to entry for new financial institutions had led to five new banks being authorised, and a "substantial increase in the number of firms discussing the possibility of becoming a bank with the regulators".
In the year to March 31 the regulators held pre-application meetings with over 25 potential applicants. "These firms have a range of different business models, from retail and wholesale banking to FCA-regulated payment services firms who are looking to enter the banking market and offer deposits and lending to their current client base (including small SMEs), and others who are proposing to offer a mixture of SME or mortgage lending funded by retail and SME deposits."
The review found that the new 'mobilisation' option (where authorisation is granted to a firm meeting primary requirements) had been helpful for firms that may previously have faced "challenges in raising capital or investing in expensive IT systems without the certainty of being authorised". Three of the five newly-authorised banks had used the mobilisation option.
In February Edinburgh-based Scoban became the first start-up bank to gain a licence, and will open its doors as Hampden private bank later this year. Founder and chairman Ray Entwistle said: "We worked very closely with people in these organisations and as a result we have a new Scottish bank."
Capital and liquidity requirements for new entrants are lower, and are set out clearly at every stage. Mr Entwistle said that had been "very helpful" in attempting to raise £40million for the launch of Hampden, adding: "We are getting very close."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article