The chief executive of housebuilder Persimmon has defended his £110 million bonus, saying that it came as a result of “a scheme that was launched at a time where the business was looking to move forward, there were stretching targets”.
Jeff Fairburn has come under pressure to give some of the bonus to charities.
Critics have attacked the bonus, which soared on the back of the builder’s decision to not set a cap on the scheme.
There has also been criticism that the company’s profits have effectively been boosted by the government’s Help to Buy scheme, which supports first-time buyers on to the housing ladder.
In December, Persimmon chairman Nicholas Wrigley and Jonathan Davie, chair of the remuneration committee resigned after failing to cap an incentive plan which was introduced in 2012.
The payout, which could see £600m shared among the management team, comes in the form of share options, 40 per cent of which can be sold now.
Mike Killoran, finance chief, picked up £86m and Dave Jenkinson, group managing director, £48m.
“Nobody has yet exercised any of those share options. From my own perspective, I have not made a decision and I’ll continue to review that,” Mr Fairburn told Reuters.
Mr Fairburn was speaking as Persimmon updated the market on its trading performance. It said it expects profits for the year to be “modestly ahead of market consensus”.
Revenues at the group rose nine per cent to £3.42 billion in 2017. Persimmon handed over the keys on 16,043 new homes last year, up 872 on the previous year. The average selling price was up three per cent to £213,300.
The company said it continued to experience healthy customer demand for new homes through the autumn sales season. The value of forward sales at 31 December 2017 of about £1.4bn was 10 per cent ahead of the previous year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel