ACADEMICS and a new tech firm are developing a way to create a "digital trail" of how a building is built in an effort to make the construction industry safer and save millions of pounds a year spent in correcting mistakes.
Edinburgh Napier University is teaming up with Glasgow-based Hypervine Ltd following a series of industry scandals, such as the Edinburgh schools crisis, which have highlighted the need for strong audit trails for undertaken work.
Poor record keeping and monitoring were cited in Professor John Cole’s damning report into the disastrous public private partnership behind the Edinburgh scandal, when a nine-tonne Oxgangs Primary School wall collapsed shortly before children were due.
The plan is to develop blockchain solutions to the data recording problems which can jeopardise complex construction projects.
A blockchain is a growing list of records or blocks, secured using cryptography and resistant to modification; technology which can reduce the risk of problems like documents being lost or actions not followed up.
Hypervine focuses on digitising construction information to improve the reporting and recording of data, enabling companies to adapt to fast-changing economic, environmental and governmental policies.
The university’s collaboration with the company will investigate ways in which blockchain can incorporate security into complicated construction processes, create trust, build compliance and boost productivity.
Professor Bill Buchanan, director of Napier's Cyber Academy and Blockpass Identity Lab, said: “The nature of the construction industry is that there are many stakeholders involved, and making sure that each part of the process is working as it should can be difficult.
“A blockchain solution will aim to integrate digital signing into the key parts of the process.”
Paul Duddy, CEO and founder of Hypervine, said: “Digitising infrastructure, construction and facility maintenance industries through blockchain technologies will yield significant improvements across the sector that will have wide ranging positive economic and social economic impacts for both private and public sectors.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here