SHETLAND oil exploration star Hurricane Energy has said board members have relinquished potentially valuable share awards following unrest about its corporate governance arrangements.
The oil and gas firm said David Jenkins and John van der Welle had relinquished, for nil consideration, awards granted to them under its non-executive director share option plan.
The Surrey-based company said the directors had made the move to affirm their independence under the UK Corporate Governance Code.
Hurricane added it does not plan to make share incentive awards to non-executive directors in the future.
The firm included news of the change in an update on progress in its efforts to enhance its corporate governance arrangements ahead of a possible move from Aim to the main market on the London Stock Exchange.
Hurricane shot to prominence after making the bumper Lancaster find West of Shetland. It raised around £400 million from investors in July to develop the field.
However, the company’s corporate governance arrangements were put in the spotlight in November after Robert Arnott resigned as chairman following a boardroom disagreement.
The company said Mr Arnott decided to resign after it became apparent there wasn’t an alignment of views between him and the rest of the board on certain aspects of its processes.
Hurricane formed a board-level listings and governance committee to evaluate its structures after he left.
It is using an executive search firm to source a new chairman. Mr Jenkins is interim chairman.
The company said:“As Hurricane continues to enhance its corporate governance ... the Company is planning to carry out a corporate governance roadshow with investors and proxy advisers to discuss the changes.”
In 2013 Hurricane introduced a scheme under which non-executive directors could be awarded options to acquire shares at minimal cost subject to conditions.
Mr Jenkins and Mr van der Welle had options to acquire up to 333,000 shares each subject to performance conditions.
The awards would only have vested if Hurricane shares had sold for an average of 55p or more for three months, compared with 39p yesterday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here