Auditors don't tend to wear their emotions on their sleeve.
When Robert Black, Scotland's first auditor general, told a parliamentary committee last week that a "passionate interest in the good of Scotland" inspired his ideas for the transformation of public services, political ears should have pricked up, rather than been covered up.
Freed from the constraints of office, Black has poured the experience of decades into a brilliantly readable David Hume Institute paper, entitled From Good To Great By 2020. Careful to stress the achievements of the Scottish Parliament, and the quality of officials, he leaves no doubt of flaws born in the complacent "years of plenty", and of the immaturity of policy debate in this small but fractious nation.
An optimist and non-combatant in the independence battle, he suggests that, regardless of its constitutional fate, Scotland could either become an international exemplar of public service reform or sink into mediocrity. He quotes Paul Krugman's dictum that "nothing counts as much to a country's wellbeing than productivity growth", while pointing out how little we know about Scotland's performance – let alone how little we can affect outcomes in government, schools and hospitals.
Unlike the Nordic countries described in last week's Economist as "awash with the blood of sacred cows", the Scottish Government is disinclined to try radical routes to preserving public services at the levels Scots expect. The one idea it holds to consistently – blaming Westminster austerity – is unlikely to work for them politically, and is irrelevant economically, as the task is to minimise the drag of what Black calls "coasting or underperforming organisations". Repeatedly telling how London constrains us is less persuasive than showing how a self-confident Scotland might implement bold new ideas, such as a Scottish Commission on resources and performance.
John Swinney's unwillingness to consider the transformational proposals of wise counsellors such as Crawford Beveridge or Robert Black, suggests that, for him, reducing risks to a Yes vote trumps attacking the root causes of underperformance. For him, the referendum stakes are thus especially high.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article