If and when finance for buyers becomes available and plentiful, housebuilding faces another hurdle - planning.
But even in this notoriously intractable area there are positive signs.
Philip Hogg recognises and applauds the efforts by the industry to ensure viable project go ahead and meet demand , but remains critical. "It's difficult and challenging," he says. "There are some good signs from some planning authorities, but not enough, and they are not spread widely enough to achieve the scale that's needed. There are real questions about the capacity of the planning service to gear up [to the pace of recovery] and deliver the right scale of approvals and consents."
Craig McLaren, director of the Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) Scotland says: "Philip is right, the ambition is there. Among planners there is a desire to be enablers and facilitators. He is also right to suggest that the problem is with how the system is resourced. It is regarded as the Cinderella service, and it needs to be recognised by councils as core to their economic ambitions. The resourcing has to follow. One of the issues that worries me is that we get to a position where demand improves, but public sector resources means that there isn't enough capacity to provide the service that we need."
McLaren also acknowledges the political leadership behind the drive to improve, including the High Level Group and Cosla, also including Heads of Planning Scotland and the RTPI as "a useful mechanism" for identifying problems.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article