Our share tips suffered a torrid time last week, with three out of our four portfolios recording overall losses when we carried out our review of progress on Wednesday.
The one exception was the 2014 list, which was fractionally ahead as gains by engineer Ricardo and recently-floated TSB cancelled out another dire performance by Marks & Spencer. Most of the M&S setback was of its own making as investors dumped the shares following its latest dismal trading update, although the British Retail Consortium added to the misery with mid-week news of falling prices throughout the UK's high streets.
We will join the sellers if the price slips a few more pence to our published stop/loss target.
Other shares suffered in a global stock market retreat sparked by fears of higher US interest rates and a slowdown in Chinese growth, while news of a downturn in UK factory production during May added to the unease.
The 2013 portfolio was the biggest casualty, down 2.1% as Lloyds Banking Group and Perth-based Stagecoach suffered an additional hit from Labour Party plans to boost competition in the transport and banking sector. Jewellery giant Signet was caught up in a general markdown of retailing shares.
The 2012 selections gave up most of the gains seen the previous week, with a 1.4% slip for Greene King putting it in danger of triggering a "sell" signal despite news of stronger profits.
The overall market trend meant our decision to add packaging group DS Smith and cash-and-carry specialist Booker to the 2011 list backfired, both ending their first week with hefty losses.
We are still convinced their shares are ripe for a recovery, but their performance dragged down the overall portfolio 1.5%.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article