BP boss Bob Dudley gave a sober assessment of the outlook for oil prices yesterday but insisted the company still expects to enjoy a long future in the North Sea, which is seen as a high cost area.
While a recent report suggested BP could quit the North Sea entirely, the US executive made clear the oil giant thinks it will make plenty of money from the bumper fields it is developing off Shetland.
His remarks underline BP’s faith in the potential of projects that were approved years ago, when oil was trading at around twice current levels.
The enthusiasm partly reflects the fact the Shetland finds are so big they can be run fairly cheaply on a cost per barrel basis using modern technology.
BP’s bullishness on Shetland may encourage others to consider drilling in what remains an under-explored area.
The company’s enduring faith in Shetland may have something to do with the sharp falls in the costs of services seen in the North Sea amid a downturn that has left suppliers jockeying for position in a shrinking market.
Many have fallen by the wayside since 2014 amid a process of retrenchment accompanied by hefty job losses.
BP has shed hundreds of posts in its efforts to boost efficiency.
Comments from Aim-listed i3 yesterday suggest the pressure on the supply chain remains intense.
The fall in costs has helped i3 to win backing for plans to develop a Moray Firth find that may have been left idle under the control of a bigger firm.
The company has identified a range of undeveloped fields it thinks could be brought into production.
Some think a large scale transfer of assets into the hands of firms that are more likely to invest in them is required in the North Sea.
It will take some time before it becomes clear whether the downturn will result in such an ownership change.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel