THE RSNO'S concert on Saturday night masqueraded as a Valentine's concert, though, from another perspective, it could have been a Romantic concert from the Raymond Gubbay stable of promotions.
Without the livery of either of these species, it was simply an opportunity to let the orchestra, with its assistant conductor Christian Kluxen, off its heavyweight leash for one evening to perform a programme of popular classics which, predictably, drew a large audience.
Even so, there was great music in the programme. Any criticism of Mozart is not just bad judgment, more a criminal offence. And in any event, the Marriage of Figaro Overture, which went like the wind, is a great masterpiece as well as the perfect musical timer to cooking a soft-boiled egg.
And there were other proper masterpieces on the programme, though in Ravel's La Valse Christian Kluxen was a wee bit sectional in his treatment of the music, not quite catching the full, cataclysmic horror of its climactic implosion.
Richard Strauss's 1944 Suite from Der Rosenkavalier is a fantastic concoction, one which detonated the RSNO in all its blazing glory, with all those boiling waltzes and a heart-wrenching instrumental version of the last-act Trio for the three female principals.
And, along with the mandatory melting moments, including a lump of La Boheme and Mascagni's beautifully played Intermezzo, we also had hot-ticket Simone Dinnerstein playing Mozart's 21st Piano Concerto with wonderfully dry articulation, if a rather soulless interpretation (minority opinion, I suspect) which featured a first movement cadenza that hovered between idiosyncrasy and eccentricity. But not a bad show.
HHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article