When Education Secretary Michael Russell published details of new legislation for colleges and universities at the tail end of last year the response from the sector was surprisingly muted.
Contained within the Post-16 Education (Scotland) Bill are extensive new powers that allow ministers to set priorities for universities in return for their public funding - including ensuring institutions comply with new rules on governance.
It also gives the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), which administers public money on behalf of the Government, powers to review the provision of courses.
As expected, the proposals provoked the usual clamour from opposition politicians who warned of a "power grab" that would "diminish the autonomy" of universities.
But Universities Scotland, the organisation that lobbies on behalf of university principals, was more circumspect, with Professor Pete Downes, the organisation's convener, making only a general plea for continuing "freedom".
As the Scottish Parliament's education committee prepares to take evidence on the Bill, more critical voices are beginning to emerge.
Last week, Alan Simpson, who leads the body that represents the chairs of university Courts, said the legislation would pave the way for the greatest political influence over higher education for more than a century.
And this week the first university principal to break cover on the issue has warned the Bill risks undermining the ability of the sector to compete on the global stage.
Professor Sir Jim McDonald, principal of Strathclyde University, highlights his concerns in a written submission to Holyrood's education committee.
"The university accepts the need for the sector to demonstrate that public investment in higher education results in positive outcomes for students, the broad economy and wider society," he said.
"Our strategy and innovative approach is due to the fleetness of foot and flexibility of approach which the principle of responsible autonomy and appropriate accountability already in place provides.
"The Bill should reinforce the principle of responsible autonomy which has served us so well in Scotland, and Parliament should be wary of the unintended consequences of changes which might, at some point in the future, be used to undermine this principle, and in doing so undermine Scotland's ability to compete in an increasingly competitive global higher education environment."
Until now, universities have been reluctant to criticise the Government, partly because of their generous Budget settlement at a time when college funding has been cut, but the signs are the mood is changing fast.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article