In case you missed it – easily done amid this week's reshuffle kerfuffle – seven pastel-coloured "power suits" worn by former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher went under the hammer on Monday and raised a total of £73,125.
The Iron Lady has few fans north of the Border, but in the wake of Monday's auction even those Scots who spit when her name is mentioned have to admit that she did at least bring a little colour to the grey, grey world of political attire.
She certainly gave far more thought to her clothes than any Prime Minister since, whose contribution to fashion has been to teach us that very posh men don't wear wedding rings and ... er, that's it.
"Appalling" is how Vivienne Westwood described Tony Blair's dress sense when she ran into his wife at a Buck House beano in 2004, but the same word could be used to describe the clothes worn by John Major and (with bells on) Gordon Brown. Scotland's First Ministers would fare no better by the Westwood yardstick, though when he stepped out in a pinstripe kilt and a flouncy Jacobite shirt, you couldn't say Jack McConnell wasn't making some kind of style statement.
But while today's male politicians are mostly a dowdy bunch who think flamboyant dressing is wearing a pink tie on Newsnight, Parliament hasn't always been an entirely fashion-free zone. Benjamin Disraeli, for one, was a famously natty dresser. A fellow guest at a dinner party he attended in 1833 described his clobber thus: "a black velvet coat lined with satin, purple trousers with a gold band running down the outside seam, a scarlet waistcoat, long lace ruffles." He was also wearing white gloves "with several rings outside them". Move over will.i.am, make room for Ben.i.am.
In the 20th century, Winston Churchill was another who wasn't afraid of shaking things up, whether with his polka dot bow ties or his trademark headgear. His favoured homburg hat was actually popularised by a previous Prime Minister, Anthony Eden, but Churchill put his own mark on millinery history by turning up to the Yalta peace conference in a fur hat that one newspaper described dismissively as "a caracul shapka of the type favoured by Muscovite shopkeepers."
Of course, I'm not saying our political class should give free rein to their more outlandish sartorial impulses. That's how you end up with Boris Johnson in a Hawaiian shirt. But in a week in which "presentation" is the hot political buzzword, perhaps they should remember that to sell the ideas, they first have to sell themselves. Call me shallow, but if my reaction to seeing Jeremy Hunt on Newsnight is "Wow, cool suit-shirt-shoes combo" then I might just listen to what he has to say – instead of shouting at him. n
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article