By diverse means, we arrive at the same end.
The conclusions reached in the recent report of the Commission on School Reform (By Diverse means: Improving Scottish Education) began with Montaigne’s words.
It’s an obvious, but nevertheless crucial, observation, especially in the field of education. One summary point elaborated:
“The autonomy of schools should be greatly extended. As a general principle, decisions that can competently be taken at school level should not be taken elsewhere.”
Most involved in schools, particularly effective institutions, would happily concur with this view. There is nothing more frustrating than reflecting, planning, and putting in place a vision for development or improvement, and then being stymied in its enactment because, as an individual school, progression is beyond your remit.
Like most things in education, however, it is a question of balance.
Procurement of resources is a case in point. Whilst an authority wide system obviously benefits from economies of scale, it can also lead to situations where individual schools are spending more than they need because of central constraints.
Schools have links to the community which can lead to favourable deals and conditions, often involving close working with parents or local companies; these opportunities may not be available across the authority – so if all cannot access, should none be able to?
I’ve contributed to a number of working parties where excellent recommendations came forth. On occasion these were not adopted because it was felt certain schools would be unable to match the requirements for success; we sometimes moved at the speed of the slowest not the quickest.
The issue of ‘balance’ also reflects local political responsibility. It is right that schools be accountable to those who fund them – the voters and taxpayers, but they also have a duty to meet the needs of their own community –pupils, parents, staff and neighbours, be it in curriculum, ethos or additional support.
It is the assessment and awareness of these needs, and the meeting of them, which denotes a successful school.
The same applies to local authorities. They should have a close working relationship with their schools so that they can support them towards effectiveness. Then they would know they can trust them with more autonomy, and facilitate them in those decisions, rather than restraining individuality.
Why shouldn’t schools, their parents and pupils and local councils negotiate the level of autonomy for individual institutions? A school community that can present its case, involving all ‘stakeholders’, can justify its ability to make decisions appropriate to its own set of circumstances.
Likewise, a local authority (interesting word!) should be confident enough in the support and leadership it provides to trust schools with these decisions, within agreed national guidelines.
I recently received a form letter from the council’s Head of Service. It was addressed ‘Dear John’, my formal name. However, I am always known in school or education as ‘Sean’. Before signing the page, she had crossed out ‘John’, and inserted ‘Sean’.
That’s a tiny symbol of the kind of close working relationship between council education departments and individual schools, staff, parents and pupils, that can lead, paradoxically, to more autonomy.
It reflects an educational insight: As long as you know what they are doing, and they’re doing it right, let them get on with it!
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article