THERE was a huge turn-out at the Edinburgh International Book Festival this week to see a real-life grown up in the flesh: Labour's former Home Secretary Alan Johnson.
He was there to talk about his childhood memoir This Boy, an unflinching account of his difficult, poverty-stricken upbringing in London in the 1950s. He described how, with his mother seriously ill in hospital, his feckless father spent Christmas Day in the pub. The young Alan and his older sister were told not to breathe a word - or their mother would die of a heart attack.
It was one of several heart-breaking stories from an early life that would have crushed most people. Instead, as we all know, the bright, ambitious and supremely resilient Mr Johnson rose through the trade union movement to become an MP for Hull then Education Secretary (the first, he believes, to have been on free school meals), Health Secretary and finally Home Secretary.
Perhaps part of his success in politics can be explained by his character. Mr Johnson is comfortable in his own skin. He is engaging, down to earth and "talks human," a dreadful cliche but a priceless asset nonetheless. It's no surprise, then, that when another former minister, Chris Mullin, urged Ed Miliband to "bring back some of the grown-ups," Alan Johnson was top of his list.
That headline-grabbing call ensured that in his book festival discussion with Ruth Wishart, Johnson could not escape searching questions about the state of his party and Ed Miliband's leadership.
For the record, he will not be tempted back into the shadow cabinet but would accept a ministerial role if Labour wins the 2015 general election.
On Labour's lacklustre summer, which has seen the party's lead over the Tories eroded and prompted widespread sniping from within, he was dismissive. "It's the kind of August story I've seen before," he said with a shrug. "There's a feeling that the economy has picked up and the Conservatives are on the front foot, so there's an attempt to suggest the opposition should be saying more and doing more. But there has never been an opposition that laid its cards on the table too early before a general election."
Mr Johnson, who supported David Miliband's leadership challenge, said he was "very impressed" with Ed's integrity. As for the leader's personal poll ratings, which lag significantly behind his party's, that's nothing to worry about so long before the election. What about Labour's looming and potentially divisive confrontation with the unions in the wake of the Falkirk selection debacle? Ed Miliband is simply completing reforms started by the late John Smith, insisted Mr Johnson. Perfectly sensible.
Well, you should have seen the looks of relief on the faces of Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont and Shadow Scottish Secretary Margaret Curran as they made their way out of the book festival venue. Mr Johnson's loyalty is a something of a rarity these days and they know it.
As the Labour leader arrived in Edinburgh yesterday for a stage-managed public Q&A session with voters on the decline in living standards under the Tory-LibDem Coalition he had no shortage of criticism and advice ringing in his ears. It started with John Prescott's blunt exhortation to use the Alex Ferguson "hair dryer treatment" on underperforming shadow ministers and has moved on to specific policies which might reinvigorate the party.
The latest, if adopted, could have a bearing on the referendum campaign. It's understood that Mr Miliband is under pressure from senior colleagues to push for an early referendum on Britain's EU membership. Supporters of the idea, said to include Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls and John Cruddas, the MP leading the party's policy review, believe it would appeal to the public, split the Tories and end the loss of English Labour voters to UKIP.
It would also, of course, raise the difficult question of which leader posed the biggest risk to Scotland's place in the EU - Ed Miliband, David Cameron or Alex Salmond?
Perhaps it's significant that the shadow cabinet's most senior Scot, Douglas Alexander, is among those who are unconvinced by the plan.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article