The events of Saturday in Glasgow have left the families of the deceased and the injured devastated.
As they face each day the question will be: what now?
The answer will be delays and legal complications.
There will be an investigation by the Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB). It carries out investigations into any accident or serious incident involving an aircraft.
A short report will come within weeks but we may wait a year for the full report.
Then there will be a Fatal Accident Inquiry (FAI). This will follow the full AAIB report but it is likely to be anything up to two years away.
The inquiry is essentially a fact-finding exercise carried out in the public interest.
The purpose of an FAI is to determine:
l Where and when the death took place
l The cause of the death
l Reasonable precautions whereby the death might have been avoided
l The defects, if any, in any system of working which contributed to the death or any accident resulting in the death
l Any other relevant facts as to the circumstances of the death.
For those who have suffered the loss of a loved one or for those who have been injured or otherwise have suffered loss, the question of compensation will arise.
And this is a question that needs to be addressed because, for those who have lost a member of the family, they may have been the main breadwinner; for those who are injured and unable to work it is a question of paying the bills and keeping going.
Then there is the necessary question of compensation for victims and their families.
Some will have lost breadwinners and some will be unable to work. It is here that the law adds complications to what might already be a bad situation.
In everyday accident claims for personal injury those at fault are liable to pay compensation to victims if they are at fault. The victim must prove fault.
In this tragedy the law adds a twist: it is different for those on the ground and those within the helicopter, despite the fact it is the same accident.
For those on the ground to be compensated, someone must be at fault. If the victims or their families can prove this they can make a claim for their loss within three years of the date of the accident.
For those on board the helicopter it is quite different. The aircraft carrier accepts liability for any accident as a condition of carriage, even when there has been no negligence.
The only proof required is that an accident occurred on an aircraft and that injuries were sustained.
Under this law, the carrier will be liable for death or injury caused to passengers. The liability is unlimited unless the carrier can prove they were not in any way at fault.
In that event, liability is limited to 100,000 special drawing rights defined and valued under the Montreal Convention.
So the burden of proof is on the carrier to escape unlimited liability, but, even if there is no fault, there is some automatic compensation, albeit limited.
For those affected on the ground, claims must be made within three years and, for those on board the aircraft, it is two years.
This legal distinction between those on board and those on the ground can lead to very different outcomes, albeit all were involved in the same tragic event. Many will think this bizarre.
For all, the FAI will be crucial in exploring what caused this accident and why. In reality, much will depend on what the AAIB finds.
For all concerned, the way ahead will be long, drawn out and fraught with legal hurdles.
As always, it will be the victims and their families who will have to shoulder this burden.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article