IN a world where certain celebrity underpants seem to be permanently round their ankles comes, at last, an unlikely glimmer of hope.
Hugh Hefner, a man who admits he stopped counting his girlfriends a long time ago, has said he believes monogamy is possible.
The octogenarian Playboy founder, due to get married to the third Mrs Hefner -- 24-year-old former playmate Crystal Harris -- this Saturday, insists his nuptials will mark the end of his carousing.
As improbable a poster boy as Hefner may seem, his conversion is a high point in what’s been a tough year for monogamy so far. First Charlie Sheen unveiled his two live-in girlfriends, declaring that polyamory is where it’s at.
Then there was the Ryan Giggs affair, while Arnold Schwarzenegger was revealed to have fathered a love-child with his family housekeeper under the nose of his wife of 25 years.
Last week, Pamela Stephenson admitted to turning a blind eye to any possible indiscretions by her husband Billy Connolly. “I don’t ask [about other women] and I don’t care,” she says. “I think monogamy’s hard for anybody.”
As for Hefner, he has dabbled in monogamy before. After marrying his second wife in 1989, the notorious Playboy Mansion was transformed into a family-friendly environment. When the couple separated in 1998, Hefner promptly reverted to his old ways.
While cynics may suggest that citing monogamy is merely saving face for a man of 85 looking to slow down in his latter years, romantics will argue that it’s simply taken Hefner the best part of nine decades to find his soulmate.
For many people, though, monogamy appears to be increasingly confused with monotony: boredom leading to a wandering eye.
But before monogamy goes the way of the proverbial Dodo, let’s suspend our disbelief for a moment. Say Hefner actually pulls it off. Could this inspire a whole new generation of men into coveting fidelity as the holy grail?
It’s a nice notion. But, then, so are fairies at the bottom of the garden -- and altogether more plausible.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article