IT WAS the imperial essayist Sir John Robert Seeley who said:
"History is past politics, and politics present history."
It's a bit mind-bending, yon, but nothing more than you'd expect from the author of Ecce Homo, a work, I should stress, that was in no way a futuristic biography of our own departed leader, the man Ecce Salmond.
I offer you this brief recce of the Ecce merely as a prelude to the following bombshell news: the poor received better treatment in Tudor times than they do today.
Now there's a bit of England-Britain disentangling to be done here, as the Tudors had nowt to do with us, other than occasionally destroying our towns and villages.
But you get the gist. And, as today we remain - voluntarily - a satellite of post-Tudor England, we suffer under the same yoke. We might want to treat the poor better. But we can't. Tough.
The author of this new claim about the poor is the historical writer Hilary Mantel, who told German newspaper Der Spiegel (tr: The Spiegel): "Even in the 16th century, Thomas Cromwell was trying to tell people that a thriving economy has casualties and that something must be done by the state for people out of work.
"Even back then, you saw the tide turning against this idea that poverty was a moral weakness."
The Mantel piece touches on a right important point: not everything in the past was worse. That goes for people too. There were people around in Roman times who were brainier than many people today. And, by the latter, I'm not just referring to the Labour Party in Scotland.
Obviously, it wasn't all good. I wouldn't have enjoyed waddling aboot in pantaloons. And there was nowhere to plug in your mobile phone.
However, at least they didn't put up with as much nonsense as we do, probably because they had face-to-face conversations. They got together and said: "This is ridiculous. I'm going to throw something." Today's peasants, on the other hand, just throw out bon mots on Twitter.
Probably just as well, I suppose. And at least today's poor are given money, even if it isn't enough to live on and comes accompanied by scorn.
Shortly before things got worse, we were told they could only get better. But as Sir John Robert Seeley would surely have said today: Aye, right.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article