THE Swiss ambassador was in the gallery for First Minister's Questions; it made a nice change from all that peace and neutrality.
Johann Lamont was away applying her best Politburo scowl to Tony Benn's funeral, leaving Jackie Baillie to defend Labour's corner, but the feuding never skipped a beat.
Ms Baillie's strategy was, as they say, bold.
No, scratch that. Not bold, barking. And doomed. And hopeless. And probably on fire as well.
It was - get this - to ask the FM to apologise.
Oh how we laughed.
She wanted him to admit he'd been wrong about Ed Miliband's plan to freeze energy bills.
Seriously, why not put in a demand for a pair of space unicorns while you're at it?
With no prospect of Alex Salmond complying, the proceedings turned enjoyably frivolous instead.
Ms Baillie accused the FM of "standing shoulder-to-shoulder with David Cameron".
The SNP backbenches exploded.
Ms Baillie, they recalled, is a director of the Better Together campaign.
Mr Salmond could scarcely believe his luck.
"When you're in a Better Together campaign, not just shoulder to shoulder, but hand-in-glove, umbilically linked to the Conservative Party, it's not the best idea to come along to this chamber and try and associate people with guilt by the Conservative Party," he crowed.
Ms Baillie never recovered.
By the end, she was asking feebly: "Is 'sorry' simply the First Minister's hardest word?"
Was it ever in doubt?
Returning to that Lab-Tory umbilical link, Mr Salmond gingerly held up a piece of paper.
"I have here the Argyll & Bute Conservative Party website," he announced, before quoting from a recent notice.
"The Cowal Conservative lunch club. Venue Argyll Hotel. Secretary Pamela Bellaby. Lunch, tea and coffee £10. Speaker - Jackie Baillie MSP."
As Ms Baillie did her best to shrug through the gale of laughter, some Nat MSPs looked on the brink of incontinence - the far brink.
"I've heard of shoulder to shoulder," the FM galloped on, "but I should tell the Labour Party, if you sup with the Tory party you should use a long spoon."
At least Ms Lamont can rest assured Labour standards were maintained.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article