It's been a good week for … a wee sherry
It's been a good week for … a wee sherry
It has long been consigned to the back of the drinks cabinet, gathering dust from one year to the next, only wheeled out to give granny her annual festive tipple. But sherry is seeing a revival.
Marks & Spencer has announced that sales of the Spanish fortified wine are already up 33% on last year, with a new generation of fans driving demand for pale, dry varieties. The retailer said it expects that popularity to continue to grow, doubling every week between now and Christmas.
While Britain has been importing sherry since the 15th century, it has been a good few years since the drink was considered the height of sophistication around these parts.
In fact, it was probably last openly enjoyed around the era when friends were invited round to gaze enviously upon your new shag-pile carpet, orange patterned wallpaper and freshly installed swanky avocado bathroom suite.
Here's hoping for a resurgence in all much-maligned classic Christmas drinks, to be sipped in front of a roaring fire while wearing a snowflake-bedecked jumper and listening to Bing Crosby. In fact, make mine a Babycham.
It's been a bad week for … misogyny
Despite being sacked by Channel 4 for being "unpalatable to a wider audience", former horse racing pundit John McCririck - he of the most alarming mutton chops since Noddy Holder from Slade - clearly doesn't know when to stop.
Appearing on Sportlobster TV last week, he referenced his time in the Big Brother house, saying: "I was on with Germaine Greer, who has ruined the lives of millions of women. The Female Eunuch gives women ideas above their station. Ideas they keep striving for but cannot reach."
A guest on the internet sports-related chat show, he added: "At Wimbledon in the tennis, women get paid the same as the men but women play three sets and the men play five. It's absolutely indefensible. If they want to be paid the same, go with five sets."
Er, John, the Victorian era called. It wants its chauvinistic and outdated views back. Deliberately provocative? Perhaps. But more to be pitied than despised.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article