ONE-UPMANSHIP aside, the recent Celtic "state aid" allegations and the new firestorm around purchases of rivals Rangers are not entirely unconnected.
Back in 2010, Sir David Murray's first attempt to sell the Ibrox club collapsed when the only realistic bidder was scared off. The steel magnate's pitch to developer Andrew Ellis that a 70,000 stadium, concert arena, hotel and shops was in the offing was a world away from the blueprint agreed with a partner agency ready to sell its land to assist Rangers' plans and thus its sale.
Agreeing to "off-market" land deals with Sir David was Glasgow City Council, now swamped with costly claims of wrong-doing and favouritism for engaging in similar business practices across the city.
Running Glasgow, it seems, requires keeping two global brands, and their support, onside, an exercise in patience, balance, appeasement and spending public cash.
Celtic and Rangers' recent efforts to tackle sectarianism and health inequalities are almost entirely taxpayer funded to the tune of several million pounds. You could say we pay for the Old Firm's conscience.
Meanwhile, the genesis of the council's involvement in the Ibrox regeneration was itself a leveller to the previous year's decision to focus the Commonwealth Games around Celtic Park.
While a perception (never as important as reality) persists that faith and allegiance within the council will always favour the Parkhead side, sources supporting both clubs and none agree on this: Celtic do politics and relationships much better than Rangers, both pre and post-liquidation. And they work at it.
Due partly to the make-up of its board, those who have dealt with both clubs point to its superior grasp of the policy landscape, decision makers and the thinking of government. "It rarely needs consultants to know what's going on", one source said.
Its comparative financial health has also allowed Celtic to play hardball better than Rangers. (Celtic chief executive Peter Lawwell still believes he got a raw deal in land deals with the council, I'm told.)
Recent circumstances on the south side haven't helped its cause but even in better times, when former CEO Martin Bain and ex-council leader Steven Purcell were pals, Rangers would go on public attack if felt wronged by the council. "It's not the best diplomacy" said another source.
Just this year, one suit on the Ibrox board made inquiries about the "state aid" and favouritism claims and was not unconvinced by the explanation and advice he received. Meanwhile, seven years since being proposed, the Ibrox plans remain unfulfilled.
In a parallel world the outcome of Celtic's "state aid" case would guide some fans towards the commercial and political realities of having two giants of the game in one city.
With the game on its knees, few professional Scottish clubs will not have benefitted from public cash.
In the real world of social media, paranoia and endless, costly complaints to broadcasters, councils and advertising watchdogs, it's more likely a foretaste of more of the same.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article