THOSE campaigning for more national parks are refusing to abandon their cause, despite the most recent significant setback.
They believe the success over the last decade of the two we have in Scotland - Cairngorms and Loch Lomond and The Trossachs - shows we need more to add to the 3500 worldwide.
They had wanted the Scottish Government to commit to more parks next year, the centenary of the death of Scots-born naturalist, explorer and writer John Muir, the father of National Parks in North America. But it is not going to happen.
Last week there was a 34-minute debate in Holyrood, secured by Claire Baker, Labour MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife.
It followed the publication in April of a report from the Scottish Campaign for National Parks (SCNP) and the Association for the Protection of Rural Scotland (APRS) entitled Unfinished Business. It recommended seven other national park sites. Ben Nevis, Glen Coe and Black Mount; a coastal and marine national park centred around Mull; Galloway; Glen Affric; the island of Harris (where clear local support had been demonstrated); and Wester Ross were mooted.
Meanwhile, it was suggested that the Northumberland National Park should be extended into Scotland, giving the Cheviots national park status. Ms Baker was not advocating early or full implementation of this report. She just wanted a national strategy group to determine how a policy on national parks should develop.
However, the night before the debate a statement was issued saying that, while the Scottish Government fully recognised the importance of our two national parks and the significant contribution they made to conservation, tourism and the wider Scottish economy, there would be no new national parks any time soon.
At the end of the debate, Environment Minister Paul Wheelhouse explained he was concerned that, at a time of such economic difficulty, communities' aspirations would be raised only to be dashed by the lack of money to establish any new parks. Neither did he think earmarking sites for long-term designation would be wise as this could lead to the communities engaging in a "quasi-bidding process". He didn't think this was the sort of thing the original national park legislation envisaged and was also concerned the two existing parks might suffer.
Such reluctance to continue official dialogue, given Mr Wheelhouse's willingness to engage in other areas, has bemused some. It will not deter enthusiasts as Bill McDermott, chairman of the SCNP made clear.
He said: "We are into what I call the agitation phase. We will be putting up a petition to the Scottish Parliament, talking to people on the ground and be active in taking the campaign forward. The strange irony in all of this is that national parks engender national pride. You would think an SNP Government would go for that."
At least he and his colleagues are used to the long haul. It took expert reports in 1945, 1974 and 1990, recommending the establishment of a least four or five parks, before Loch Lomond and The Trossachs was established in 2002 and the Cairngorms the year after.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article