By and large, the news that Scotland was to join the growing number of European countries with a rural parliament was met by some pretty energetic head-scratching.
The SNP's manifesto commitment in 2011 to convene such a gathering "to enable rural communities to engage more effectively with government" had passed many by, and confused others.
But the following year Rural Affairs Secretary Richard Lochhead made clear it was definitely on the agenda: "Scotland's Rural Parliament will empower our rural communities, giving them a stronger voice and genuine access to decision-making."
However it would not be a formal part of government, nor a parliament in the sense of a legislative or decision-making body. Rather it was billed as a "bottom-up" process of engagement and debate between the people of rural Scotland and policy makers "to enable better understanding, improved policy and action to address rural issues".
That is what's expected of its first meeting when 400 from across the land gather in Oban for three days next week. The project has been criticised, but mostly it has been ignored. However it is intriguing. It can hardly be presented as a cynical ploy to gain party political advantage.
Rather it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that Mr Lochhead has been carefully preparing a stick with which rural Scotland is going to give him, or his ministerial successors, a damn good thrashing.
The million-plus people who live in Scotland's rural areas have very different interests. There is much that divides the "barley barons" of East Lothian from the crofters on Tiree, the bed and breakfast operator in Caithness from the community councillor in a Borders village.
But there is also much that can unite them in common complaint, including poor broadband and concern about out-of-hours GP services, transport and fuel costs. Scotland's first rural parliament surely will be seen as a failure unless it throws down the gauntlet on these or similar matters. This will be to the Scottish Government primarily, although the likes of local authorities, health boards and quangos will also be in its sights.
There is likely to be a list of demands and aspirations, many of which will be hard to satisfy. The next such gathering will then probably go through a report card grading progress on each item.
If the examples of Sweden, the Netherlands, Estonia, Slovakia and Finland are followed, the rural parliament will not be reconvened for two years. This should put it beyond the next Holyrood elections, so it will be the next Scottish administration that has to account for its actions on the rural parliament's wish list.
This may have reassured colleagues in the Scottish Cabinet who were understood to have been initially sceptical about Mr Lochhead's idea.
Now it is over to those participating in Oban, government and community representatives alike to show a rural parliament can enhance this participative democracy in terms of engagement and accountability, rather than clutter it up for no good reason.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article