It was the Met Ball last night.
"The what now?" I hear you ask … You know, the Metropolitan Museum of Art's annual fashion event in New York, where celebrities line up to have their picture taken on a plush red carpet wearing all manner of exquisite jewels and elaborate clothing.
"Fancy outfits and celebrities, then?" Yes, fancy outfits and celebrities.
Instead of taking you through a frock-by-frock narrative of what every Anna (Wintour), Sarah (Jessica Parker) and Taylor (Swift) wore - no, I have little interest in that either - I've decided to delve a little deeper and look at the story behind the celebrity fashion hoopla.
Let's call it a tale of fashion, society and influence and what that really says about how we dress today.
The theme for this year's Met Ball was the 20th-century Anglo-American couturier, Charles James.
Mr James was a man who made his name in the early half of the 20th century dressing women in the "taxi dress", the "figure-eight skirt" and the "Pavlovian waistband", which could discreetly expand after a large meal.
In short, Mr James was a man who made fabulous frocks for fabulous women, who occasionally dined on fabulous food.
Despite that, you'd be hard pushed to find someone outside the inner circle of fashion who knows who this great creative was.
Not a household name, but Charles James clothing was worn by a select group of wealthy, in-the-know women who spent their days attending posh soirées. The era's equivalent of high street this was not.
Yet the high society outfits created by Mr James do actually have some relevance today.
With their undulating hemlines and strapless bodices, they give us a glimpse into a bygone era, when glamour and sophistication took precedence over all else.
Granted, most women of that time weren't wearing Mr James's designs (few could afford such an extravagance) but his creations do reflect how women once aspired to look.
Nowadays, the notion that women (or men) would all want to look one certain way is, of course, outdated.
Individuality is key. We all dress how we please in the modern world.There is none of that clothing-by-numbers lark that hemmed in (in some cases quite literally) how women ought to look. We've moved on. We're better off now.
Except: are we? Flicking through pictures of Mr James's famous designs, it's easy to see why the Met in New York has chosen to celebrate his work.
These are museum-worthy frocks. Now think of how we all dress today (even cash-rich celebrities) and ask yourself this: would any of our gear be worth exhibiting in 50 years time? Probably not.
"That doesn't matter," you say. Fair enough. Still, I wonder whether our inevitable sartorial legacy is really preferable to that of Mr James's elegant frocks.
Maybe we're not so better off after all.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article