TENSIONS between the main No parties are bubbling to the surface after a wobbly few days for Better Together.
Labour voices believe George Osborne and Alistair Carmichael made a hash of Sunday's announcement that a timetable for agreeing and delivering greater devolution was imminent. The Chancellor's comments created an expectation that new powers would be offered, but no such plan is on the table.
The Conservatives, meanwhile, especially Westminster backbenchers who are finally waking up to the referendum, are aghast that Labour seems to be struggling to persuade its own supporters to vote No. They point to polls showing Ed Miliband, who is due to campaign alongside Gordon Brown at a rally later this week, is no more trusted in Scotland than David Cameron.
Better Together is not yet panicking but there is concern over the tightening polls, which do not reflect Labour's own canvassing. Party insiders insist their contacts with tens of thousands of voters, not just their own supporters, reveal consistently high levels of support for a No vote.
Their bafflement will not be aided by today's TNS poll, the third in a row after recent Panelbase and YouGov surveys saying the referendum is balanced on a knife edge. However they do believe the numbers "will focus minds and spur people to action," as one insider put it.
Better Together is also taking comfort from Quebec's 1995 referendum. The Yes side was seven percentage points ahead at a similar stage but lost (albeit by a whisker). The lesson of most referendums, say Better Together strategists, is that the side calling for change needs a substantial lead going into the vote, as caution takes over in the privacy of the polling booth.
They also believe the slide in the value of the pound, down by one per cent at one point yesterday, the biggest single-day dip for more than a year, will alert people to potential economic risks of independence.
The Yes campaign, however, also sees an opportunity in the pound's fall. Some Nationalists believe Mr Osborne will have to give his public backing to the SNP's currency union proposal in order to calm market jitters. It's hard to see that happening. A U-turn on that scale would surely dent the Chancellor's credibility beyond repair. However, Nicola Sturgeon attempted to turn the tables on the Chancellor yesterday, saying currency union talks now would give the markets some reassurances. "It is the UK Government that's creating the uncertainty by refusing to have those sensible discussions," she said.
The Yes campaign has handled its surge in the polls with great care. Privately, senior SNP figures have said they would rather not have taken the lead at this stage (YouGov put Yes ahead by 51 per cent to 49 per cent, excluding the don't-knows, on Sunday) fearing it would produce a bounce back to No. As a result, Alex Salmond and Ms Sturgeon have been at pains to stress the Yes camp remains the underdog.
Meanwhile their foot soldiers are enthused, energised and armed with a strong sense of belief that victory is within their grasp in nine days' time. What's not in doubt is how crucially important these final days have become to both sides.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article