Just over 900 of Scotland's deaf young people can expect to go to university.
If they were hearing, that figure would be nearly 1400. That's the attainment gap facing Scottish deaf children, one which significantly affects their chances of going to further or higher education and their chances of a job afterwards.
The National Deaf Children's Society will warn this week that deaf young people are underrepresented in a number of post-16 destinations and that more needs to be done about it.
In fact, the society will argue that, until now, we didn't even have a handle on the problem. "We didn't have the evidence," explains the NDCS's Scottish director Heather Gray. "This will be the first clear evidence that this gap exists."
The phenomenon is already recognised in England and Wales, the NCDS points out, where systems are now in place to monitor the difference between the number of deaf young people who progress to university or employment and those who do so in the hearing population. In each case the gap is more than 10%.
Barriers include problems with the transition and planning process when young people reach university or college. Some still find the facilities they need such as technologies to aid hearing in lectures are not in place and they have to fight to get them.
There is also a concern about a reduction in the number of people qualified to teach deaf pupils.
But south of the Border, policies are being put in place to tackle the hurdles which hold deaf children back and measure every year whether the outcomes for such young people are changing. Scottish campaigners want to see similar measures to gauge the extent of the problem and monitor improvements.
Controversially, some want to see deaf young people treated as a separate group with specific needs in schools and fear that they are not helped by the movement to "mainstream" all children rather than identify individual groups.
Mainstreaming policies were designed to stop the ghettoisation effect of special schools and have widespread support in the educational community. Although there is an argument to be made that the needs of deaf children are specific, it seems far from assured that hiving many off from the mainstream would make it easier to meet university entrance requirements or receive the services and support they need.
One factor in all this is the rising numbers of deaf young people. The figures at the top of this piece are based on the fact that there are more than 3500 deaf children in Scotland, however, estimates suggest the real number could be more than 3800. The figures have steadily increased, partly due to a higher incidence of deafness within some migrant populations, but also due to a push to identify children with hearing problems at an earlier age. A universal newborn screening programme has contributed to this.
NCDS points out that as well as an attainment gap between the hearing and non-hearing population, there are significant geographical differences in Scotland. But there is no obvious reason why these gaps should so large, they say, and it is time Scotland started addressing the problem.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article