This week, the Scottish Government launched a new national discussion.
Its avowed aim is to ask people what that Government should do with the new powers that it will receive under the Scotland Act 2015 - whether further devolution allows it to promote both a "strong competitive economy and a fairer, more equal society".
The launch document lists some of the aims it wants to promote, including a reduction in gender inequality, as well as new ways to address the link between poverty and poorer health, between education attainment and crime. If you are not the cynical sort, it is an uplifting read, outlining the progress since devolution and a range of future aspirations.
There are two, equally plausible, ways to describe this discussion.
The first, articulated by commentators such as David Torrance and Kevin McKenna, is that the discussion is primarily a cynical exercise designed to kill time and avoid the big decisions - including major public service reforms and tax rises - that would help make Scotland fairer but its Government less popular.
The second, articulated by the Government, is that the talking is the most important part of the doing. It argues that the way we make policy matters. It's time to stop just making decisions for people or, at least, first ask them what we should do. It's time to stop making policy from the top down, involve people and communities in policy making, make the big decisions together, then invite local communities to make sense of broad aims in specific areas.
Somewhere in between those positions you have other people, including me, who remain optimistic but want to talk through the problems before getting too excited. Here are my top three.
First, the new devolution settlement, produced after "negotiations" between elected politicians and government departments, is a horrible mess. I genuinely don't understand the settlement or know what the Scottish Government can do with it.
Secondly, anyone who tells you that public sector reform makes complex government simpler and saves you money is selling you snake oil. Instead, it's a long-term investment for the future, at a time when the Government's main impetus is to spend less to balance the books.
Thirdly, we have not resolved the central-local question. Instead, this discussion should reinvigorate a debate about how national we want policy to be, to ensure uniform entitlement to benefits and services, and how local it should be, to allow governments to tailor policies to local needs. We want both, but we shouldn't pretend that life is that simple.
My gut tells me that the Scottish Government will try to make a difference but will start with the low-hanging fruit. Some modest reforms, addressing the hot-button topics like the bedroom tax, and based on trying to see the system through a service user's eyes, can make a genuine difference and help maintain the SNP's reputation for governing competence.
It will not, however, produce the fundamental change that some might associate with a fairer Scotland.
Paul Cairney, a Fellow of the Centre on Constitutional Change, is Professor of Politics at the University of Stirling.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article