This Thursday, Glasgow City Council's Executive Committee will reconsider the strategy it previously voted through for mental health services in the city.
Given that executive director for social care David Williams is not expected to change his advice on the way forward, it seems likely the council will press ahead with its plan to cut the budget of Glasgow Association for Mental Health, and reshape the way it and Carr Gomm, another mental health charity, work.
But while feelings are still running high over the policy, the issues risk being lost amid party political rivalries and arguments over definitions.
The committee at which councillors voted to force the rethink raised the question 'when is a cut not a cut'.
Mr Williams seemed to argue that the driving force for the changes was not to save money and that because GAMH was being asked to do something different for less money, the term 'cut' was inappropriate.
This was given short shrift by the charity's chief executive Jenny Graydon after the meeting. "If 30 qualified mental health workers are going to lose their jobs, and the number of hours of support are being cut in half, surely that's a cut - even if you call it a realignment?" she said.
Ms Graydon expressed her feelings during the meeting as well, contrasting the respectful way discussions took place in the City Chambers with the 'disquieting' dealings since GAMH began discussing a range of cuts with officials last autumn - including the need for services to be more focused on outcomes.
It was wrong to say outcomes for service users were not recorded, she said, they are - in an academically approved manner - but the council now wants something different.
This was under discussion, and the charity had accepted and budgeted for a 30 per cent cut in September, that all changed in October, on the basis of a new review of mental health services, she said. "All of a sudden it was 40 per cent with no reason being given, in writing or verbally. We didn't see the service review until the day before the executive committee met - giving us no chance to respond.
"That meant 10 more people would lose their jobs and users would lose 1000 hours of service. It felt quite punitive."
Statements from the council suggested GAMH had not been performing, she said. "In public the council was saying 'GAMH has to improve its services. But there is no evidence for that. We found that unacceptable."
The council denies any such briefing against the charity took place. However the service review itself does state: "A review of the services delivered by GAMH... has highlighted a clear need to improve the performance of the provision."
The row looks set to rumble on. But there are real questions at the heart of this about the best way to deliver mental health services and the potential cost to other services of getting it wrong. It is in noone's interests for it to become bogged down in politics, or semantics.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article