A HOLYROOD colleague likened Alex Salmond's demeanour at the publication of the GERS statistics on Wednesday to the description by Samuel Pepys of Major General Thomas Harrison as he was about to be hung, drawn and quartered:
"He was looking as cheerful as any man could do in that condition."
So what would be the Salmond demeanour for the inevitable re-run at First Minister's Questions? Much the same, if truth be told, cheerful with a stiff measured defiance.
It is said that once he'd been hanged for a bit, and having had his "privy members" cut off, and with his entrails hanging out, the Major General felt provoked and took a swing at the executioner, prompting his swift beheading. The most out of hand things get these days is an STV debate or a dressing down by Tricia Marwick.
There was a grim inevitability about FMQs. Oh, how our hearts sank as the SNP got their retaliation in first - from James Dornan to John Swinney regarding Standard & Poor's recent positive assessment of the Scots economy. We knew it was a patsy question because the Finance Secretary said so, calling it a "fair and dispassionate point".
We were less than thunder-struck, when Johann Lamont opened on the GERS figures - a £12 billion deficit, equivalent to the NHS budget, a £4bn fall in oil revenue, the size of the budget for schools, the need for hiked taxes or slashed spending.
But then, to less surprise, came the Salmond response, identical to the day before, highlighting that if the figures were taken over five years they fit the Nation-alist scenario with Scotland £8bn better off over the period relative to the UK, equivalent to £1600 for every adult and child.
By now Ms Lamont was getting her dander up. "Are you relaxed at having a £4bn loss? I'm not even asking difficult questions like the currency, the groat, the bawbee or whatever."
It's probably never a great idea for a Scots politician to use mock-ing terms such as the groat or bawbee. That's our job in the meedja. Salmond interpreted thus: "Telling Scots we are too poor will get you a giant raspberry."
And so it went on. Ruth Davidson went on GERS. Willie Rennie went on GERS. This year's poor show kept getting the response that measured over years produced a different picture. Sod the "broad shoulders" of the UK, Salmond said: "How can oil be a huge advantage for the UK but a huge burden for Scotland?"
By the time Mr Rennie stepped up we were losing the will to live. It was going to take burned privy members or ripped out entrails for us to take notice. Sadly, none was forthcoming. Ms Marwick would have ruled it out of order.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article