PUBLIC marriage proposals: a form of emotional abuse.
Is anyone with me? Oh, probably not.
I always wonder why, when you are an adult woman, and you are in a relationship with an adult man, it's not sufficient for one of you to say to the other, in the privacy of your own home and at your leisure, "It might make good financial and legal sense to sign a contract meaning we get half of each others' cash when we break up."
It might not be romantic but there's certainly something sexy about a bit of clear-eyed pragmatism.
I have heard otherwise normal and intelligent women talk of how they refused to take part in their boyfriend's favourite hobby, hillwalking, "unless there was a diamond at the top" or how they spent a whole holiday in the huff because they assumed this trip would be The Trip and it wasn't.
These woman are not swiftly dumped, as they should be, but are married and responsible for the perpetuation of every cliche of women being stroppy, diamond-hungry harpies.
It is not enough to take a woman out for dinner, give her some flowers and bend on one knee. There has to be a flashmob, the stopping of foot traffic in major shopping centres on Bank Holiday weekends and a professional videographer to record the whole thing. You might even bring a football stadium to a stop, if you don't have enough friends or money to arrange 40 singers bleating Stevie Wonder outside the poor woman's place of work.
One Matthew Dick, from London, has managed to tread a fine line between "proposal in the privacy of your own home" and "ostentatiously making sure the whole world knows I'm a big gestures guy."
Mr Dick somehow persuaded one of The Times newspaper's cryptic crossword cruciverbalists to create a bespoke crossword that would convey his desire to put a ring on it. Her. Put a ring on her.
Blithely disregarding the opinions and desire of the regular crossword enthusiasts who take The Times, lovestricken Mr Dick was initially perturbed that his sweetheart, Delyth Hughes, said no but was quickly relieved to find her joking. Of the proposal, Ms Hughes said it was a "typical" gesture from her boyfriend who is "a smart-arse at the best of times".
To go back to the emotional abuse: what of the women who are not expecting such spectacles? Who aren't sure how they feel about this man and this relationship but feel press-ganged into saying "yes" because they're on the screen of a 40,000-seater arena?
More than that: what about the emotional equilibrium of the poor bystanders who have to suffer the inward cringe of waiting to see whether the lady races off in tears or whether she's daft enough to enjoy having rudely interrupted the goings-ons of several dozen strangers?
Still, I'm heartened by the final words of Mr Rogan. "We won't be doing it again," he said. Men of the world: take note.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article