FOR all the babble about politics never being the same again after the referendum, First Minister's Questions was strangely familiar.
Alex Salmond was still playing the FM-inator, slaying all comers with mechanical efficiency, Johann Lamont was still understudying for somebody decent, Ruth Davidson wasn't bad but remained an accursed Tory, and apple-cheeked nipper Willie Rennie was still being patronised horribly by that nasty big man at the front.
Seemingly bored with winning last week, Ms Lamont wasted no time reviving her losing streak by demanding answers about the secret privatisation of the country's medical records. This was based on a press report about £1.6 million of new software for GPs.
Mr Salmond, she claimed, was the biggest privatiser of the NHS in Scottish history.
"Er, no, it's an IT system," said the FM.
"It's like saying this parliament is being privatised because we use Windows."
The mute tiers of Labour MSPs said it all.
Never healthy, Ms Lamont's line of attack was already in critical condition.
"Perhaps the First Minister could break the habit of a lifetime and indulge in a little truth-mongering?" she tried.
But Mr Salmond only teased her about rumours she is soon to be replaced as Labour leader.
"Don't worry," she gasped. "When the FM is long gone I'll still be doing my job."
But when a political leader has to deny there's a coup afoot, they're in deep trouble.
Ms Lamont isn't quite Ceausescu waving from the balcony, but all she needs is a balcony.
"I hope she continues as opposition leader for some considerable time," Mr Salmond went on.
"If so, it won't be because of the enthusiastic support of her own colleagues."
As Labour MSPs tried to drown him out, the FM simply bawled the names of Ms Lamont's rivals.
"Jim Murphy, Anas Sarwar," he yelled into the din. "I'm not as pessimistic about the prospects of the Labour Party as the Labour Party," he roared.
It fell to Ruth Davidson to silence Ms Lamont's tormentor with a line on his replacement.
"That's why we need a woman's touch," she said.
When even the Tories are moved to help a Labour leader, you know the vital signs on the monitor aren't good.
As they say on Holby City, "Beeeeeeeeeeep!".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article