It's been a good week for ...
minimalism
For decades, conceptual artists have been pussyfooting around the edges of minimalism. Trimming a bit here, removing an element there, but always shying away from truly embracing the concept. Now, at last, a bold new exhibition has taken the bull by the horns in a breathtaking Emperor's New Clothes moment.
Invisible: Art About The Unseen 1957-2012, which launched at London's Hayward gallery last week, features 50 invisible works by artists including Yoko Ono and Andy Warhol. Yes, that's right, rational adults are expected to queue up and hand over eight British pounds in exchange for a whole lot of nothing. I jest. Even the boldest curator wouldn't seriously charge for absolutely nothing. No, exhibits include a piece of white paper which has been stared at by one artist, a blank pedestal briefly stepped upon by another and some air punched by a third when he realised he was on to a good thing.
Tune in next week for my invisible column. Usual fee applies, of course.
It's been a bad week for ... performing parents
It's the thought of all the time and energy wasted over the years that's the real killer. Parents have just learned that hours spent leaping around the kitchen making "aeroplanes" with mashed veg to entice their tots to eat well, and engaging in protracted dinner-time bartering to make teenagers eat their greens in exchange for freedom/pudding/TV, may have been a colossal waste of time. According to new research published in the British Journal of Developmental Psychology, the best way to encourage your children to chow down on the healthy stuff is to eat your own vegetables while beaming with pleasure. A heartfelt smile while chewing broccoli is all that is required to convince the little 'uns that they are missing out on something good.
Is this news? Smiling has always been the advertising man's weapon of choice. For decades, ad gurus have been teaming the most hideous products with a dazzling smile with impressive results. How else do you explain the success of Marmite?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article