AS the January gloom descends, a perennial conversation is being replicated in pubs, living rooms and around water coolers: how much money would it take for you to give it all up and live off the big fat bank balance?
My mother always swears £100,000 would be enough, while a friend reckons nothing less than £10 million would do (by the time she buys the yacht, two ponies and a property portfolio to rival Donald Trump's there won't be much small change left over).
According to a new report, £1m is the "magic amount" which most British people reckon would allow them to leave their jobs and live comfortably for the rest of their lives. That's a smidge more than eight weeks' salary for footballer Rio Ferdinand.
But then he clearly works hard for all the money, posting on Twitter last week: "While u guys around the world are out celebrating New Year spare a thought for me please ..."
It conjured up images of the Manchester United defender leaping from a search-and-rescue helicopter to save lives or toiling tirelessly in a laboratory to cure cancer. But, er, no. He continued: "I'll be in the team hotel sleeping!!" No doubt on expensive sheets.
The retort of one disgruntled punter – employing terms not printable in a family newspaper – became a viral hit. Another lamented: "Must be a hard life getting paid more in a week than most earn in a year."
In stark contrast is Dumfries man Barry Little who last week toasted a £1m EuroMillions win. Asked what he would do with his new fortune, Little, who two years ago suffered a back injury which forced him to give up work and sell the family home, said he would happily settle for a 3D telly and a family holiday. And that, Mr Ferdinand, is called perspective.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article