The collapse of Glasgow's attempt to sign up care homes for a new deal on residential care for the elderly has left the city council's plans in disarray.
But it will affect other councils too. Glasgow's own report on the plans stated that if the rates it offered were agreed, they would quickly be replicated by other councils. But the rates were not agreed.
The council has tried to portray care home owners as deliberately disrupting the tendering process, by making excessive and unsustainable demands. But more than half of the city's existing care providers said they were unable to provide care at the current price, some demanding up to 48 per cent more.
The council was faced with a crisis, social work chief David Williams warned. It risked running out of nursing care for the city's most vulnerable older people in under six months.
Those suspicious of private provision might accept the council's view that home owners had worked together to thwart efforts to get the best value for council tax payers.
The council also says Scottish Care, which represents care home owners, has exaggerated the cost of its in-house care. Private providers are angry the council spends more on this than it is willing to pay suppliers. The council admits in-house costs more, but disputes the difference is large.
Scottish Care argues Glasgow refused to recognise the true cost of providing care to its most vulnerable citizens and the need to pay care staff fairly for the skilled work they do.
This is not a new debate: Earlier this year a Scottish Government report warned underfunding residential care could lead to firms going bust, cause difficulty in retaining quality staff and a general decrease in the level of services.
Glasgow is now asking for guidance from ministers - who asked for local commissioning of elderly care - and such guidance has been promised by the end of the year. And are cash-strapped councils trying to underfund it? The logic of a tender process is that a public body can get good value through the private and voluntary sector competing against each other to provide the best price, to get the work.
It relies on driving the price down on the basis that one firm will undercut another to gain a competitive advantage. But there were hardly any takers. If you believe in market forces at all, the very fact that mechanism has failed is a sign that Glasgow has got its offer badly wrong.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article