BRITAIN has a new hero: Ingrid Loyau-Kennett, the woman captured on camera talking it out with the still-bloodied, machete-wielding killers of Drummer Lee Rigby.
Indeed, she was one of three such figures, dubbed "the Angels of Woolwich", to emerge as the reassuring antidote to the story of the brutal public slaying of a soldier.
Even as we recoiled in shock at this attack, we focused, through the footage and stills of the event, on these three women: Loyau-Kennett, plus mother and daughter Amanda and Gemini Donnelly-Martin, blurred figures seen offering comfort and prayers over the soldier's body. How had they found the courage to walk into the midst of this horror?
As with all such atrocities, we looked for heroes to counterpoint the barbarism. Seeing what she thought was an injured person lying in the street, Loyau-Kennett got off her bus intending to offer first aid, but found herself talking to the attackers. She hadn't been scared because "he was not drunk, he was not on drugs. He was normal". She asked the other attacker if he wanted to give her what he was holding, which she knew to be a knife.
Many witnesses testified to the courage of the three women. Amanda Donnelly-Martin, according to witness Joe Tallant, had "just walked up to them [the attackers] with no fear. She put her hands on his [Rigby's] chest and I think she prayed for him". Donnelly-Martin is reported to have said she stepped forward "because she thought it could have been her own son".
What is apparent is that these women, and others, seem to have been acting on instinct, unaware exactly what the situation was.
"What were all the male bystanders doing?" one online commentator asked of the Woolwich aftermath. In fact, the attackers had told the men to stand back, in effect deciding who was permitted to be the heroes and that they would be female.
Gemini Donnelly-Martin told the Mirror: "We did what anyone would do. We just wanted to take care of the man. It wasn't brave. Anyone would have done it."
The attackers had specifically allowed women on to the scene because in their eyes, women were not a threat. In his rant to camera after the killing, suspect Michael Adebolajo said: "I apologise that women had to witness this today but in our lands our women have to see the same."
Of course, to say that women are the gentle pacifists, the bearers of non-violence, is simplistic. According to reports, it was a female armed police officer who shot the Woolwich suspects as they moved forwards with their weapons.
I celebrate Ingrid Loyau-Kennett's heroism. It takes great courage to walk up to men whose hands are still bloodied. And, though I find it troubling that she was only permitted that role because she was a woman, it seems for the most part good that we live in a society where women can have this enduring function as non-aggressors; that they can be seen as mothers and sisters, not fighters.
All three of these women claimed there was nothing particularly brave or special about what they did. But most of us have read their stories and disagreed. We have doubted whether, come the hour, we ourselves would have such courage.
Identifying everyday heroes in horrific circumstances is partly about making ourselves feel better and reassuring ourselves that civilisation has not collapsed.
Again and again we look for a hero, someone who, finding themselves in the wrong place at the right time, rises to the occasion. In the London riots we found "grandmother" Pauline Pearce, who was caught on camera lecturing those on the rampage: "This ain't about fun and burning up the place."
With the Boston Marathon attack, it was cowboy-hatted peace campaigner Carlos Arredondo who, after the blasts, ran across the street to tear away fencing and scaffolding to reach victims.
The "angels of Woolwich", like these other heroes, reassure us of something else. One of our fears is that we are a society of bystanders, of mobile phones on legs, whose only interventions are to upload what has already happened on YouTube. But these women suggest that, as well as those who walk on by, there are some active citizens.
This is not to say that those who watched, witnessed and merely tweeted failed. There is only room for so many angels in a situation like this. And where we find them, they are justly to be celebrated. Not because they form the perfect piece of propaganda for our side, but because to talk of them, and their courage or calm, is the one antidote to the explosion of fear-generating publicity any horror like this creates.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article