Presumably Derek Keilloh swore a version of the ancient Hippocratic Oath when he qualified as a doctor.
It will have included a promise to treat his patients with dignity and respect, to do good and not evil, to provide a good standard of care and to act with honesty and integrity. His actions in Iraq, where he served as a medical officer with the First Battalion Queen's Lancashire Regiment, were a cruel mockery of that oath on every level.
Baha Mousa, the hotel receptionist beaten and tortured to death by British troops in Basra in September 2003, was later found to have 93 injuries. His own father did not recognise him. Nobody who has seen the image of Mr Mousa after his death is likely to forget it. Yet throughout a series of courts martial and a subsequent public inquiry, this doctor swore under oath that he saw no injuries to Mr Mousa's body beyond a little dried blood around the nose.
Yesterday Dr Keilloh, originally from Aberdeen but now working as a general practitioner in Yorkshire, was found guilty of "misleading and dishonest" conduct. The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service ruled that he knew the dead man's condition but did not report it to senior officers or assess other detainees and protect them from further mistreatment. The General Medical Council must now decide on what action to take. Options include suspending him or striking him off, if it decides his behaviour amounted to misconduct. If the GMC fails to make an example of Dr Keilloh, it will send out the message to other army medics that normal conduct is suspended during war operations and they are free to turn a blind eye to anything. That would be a travesty of justice.
Context is important. These suspects turned out to be innocent civilians whose weapons were intended to defend hotel guests, but a rumour had circulated in the British regiment that they had murdered members of the Royal Military Police. There was fear and anger and the detainees were supposedly being "softened up" for questioning. However, that is no excuse for the soldiers' subsequent thuggery and collapse of discipline. Dr Keilloh was the one man on the spot who could have stopped it but, as one survivor put it: "He heard our cries and he didn't do anything."
Just 28 years old and only eight weeks into the job, he may plead inexperience but his failure to intervene during or after these events amounts to collusion. Army medics cannot afford to be squeamish but ignoring such brutality amounts to a betrayal of all the servicemen and women who behave decently and within the rules. It also acts as a recruiting sergeant for extremism and destroys at a stroke any goodwill built up with the local population. It is shameful that it has taken so long to uncover the truth. Though maltreatment of detainees may not have been routine, the fact that a number of other such inquiries are still crawling through the system suggests this was more than the work of a "few bad apples". It is also disturbing that the Justice and Security Bill, currently going through Parliament, is likely to make it harder than ever to get to the truth in such cases.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article