LAST month, the London School of Economics published research suggesting that half of all Britons had been inspired by Team GB's cycling success to get into the saddle themselves.
A few weeks on, two of the Olympic team's brightest lights have been injured on the roads – and today, we report that the number of serious injuries to cyclists and pedestrians in Scotland has risen sharply, by 13% and 12% respectively.
We can only hope that these revelations will not deter those new cycling enthusiasts. Given the importance of cutting carbon emissions and tackling obesity, all of us need to walk and cycle more, and drive less. Moreover, if parents are to feel confident about letting their children walk and cycle to school, urgent action is needed to make the streets safer.
Dedicated cycle paths, the extension of 20mph zones and the enforcement of speed limits are urgently needed. So, too, is investment in education aimed at everyone who uses the roads. For while it is true that cyclists and pedestrians can be guilty of jumping red lights or jay-walking, police report that two-thirds of crashes involving adult cyclists are drivers' fault, and that just one in five is caused solely by the cyclist.
Most importantly, perhaps, all road users need to start treating each other with respect. Too many drivers see cyclists as a nuisance when, in fact, they are helping to reduce the volume of traffic, keeping our streets cleaner, quieter and more pleasant for everyone. Meanwhile, bike-users who ride hazardously on pavements endanger the lives of pedestrians and sour attitudes towards cyclists.
By 2020, the Scottish Government hopes one in 10 of all journeys will be made by bicycle. It's an ambitious target – but what have we got to lose from helping to make it happen?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article