DAVID Cameron's announcement during Prime Minister's Questions earlier this week that energy companies will be required in law to give customers the lowest available deals prompted immediate questions about how this would work.
Unfortunately, Energy Secretary Ed Davey had no idea because there had been no prior discussion with the department responsible for implementing the scheme.
Mr Davey carefully distanced himself from a developing row yesterday, providing unspoken confirmation that the announcement was another example of policy made on the hoof. It led to a day of confusion focusing on whether making sure customers "get" the lowest tariff available meant that would be the rate they were charged or whether the entitlement would apply only to information offered. The eventual announcement that the Energy Bill would contain an obligation on the energy companies to offer the lowest tariffs to more people was, if not a U-turn, a considerable rolling back from Mr Cameron's initial claim.
As shadow energy secretary Caroline Flint observed, this had all the appearance of a panic-inducing clanger from the political satire The Thick of It. But it's not funny. As more major energy suppliers announce price rises, large numbers of people are increasingly worried about how they are going to pay their utility bills. Mr Cameron was correct in identifying the cost of electricity and gas as a major concern and the need for the Government to require the suppliers to give consumers a better deal. His off-the-cuff solution, however, betrayed only a nodding acquaintance with the failings of the system, although these have all been well publicised for years. Mr Cameron has recognised the unnecessary confusion caused by the multiplicity of tariffs on offer. But the "big six" energy companies have reduced the number of options available and already have a voluntary agreement to provide customers with annual advice on the best tariff for them. This is a step forward, which should be made compulsory in next month's energy bill, but it does not tackle the more fundamental problem of those on the lowest incomes paying higher tariffs. This is because the best deals are available to those with access to a computer and the ability to make comparisons; those with sufficient regular income to pay by direct debit; and those on dual fuel agreements. Compelling companies to charge the lowest available tariff would help some elderly householders but the sanction does little for those on benefits, the increasing number on short-term contracts and those in rural areas with no mains gas.
The most significant obstacle to a system of automatically charging lowest tariffs, however, is that it would erode competition, the mechanism which is supposed to keep prices down. Energy prices must now be added to the blunderlist of announcements requiring hasty amendment or embarrassing U-turns. Conservative ministers seem to seize on policies without thinking them through or telling their Liberal Democrat partners in the Coalition. It is not the mark of competent government.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article