HOME Secretary Theresa May is to be congratulated on making the correct decision in refusing to extradite Gary McKinnon to the US.
Claims that this is a victory for common sense and compassion on behalf of someone who has Asperger's syndrome and deemed at high risk of suicide, however, must be tempered by the fact that the 46-year-old computer geek has spent the last 10 years of his life in a permanent state of anxiety about his fate.
The case of Mr McKinnon (and those of several other UK citizens wanted for prosecution in the US for alleged crimes committed in Britain) confirms that the extradition treaty between the UK and the US is seriously out of kilter.
Mr McKinnon has admitted hacking into dozens of Pentagon and Nasa computers from his London bedroom. He was neither terrorist nor criminal but on an obsessive hunt for evidence of UFOs. However, US officials have insisted that he should be prosecuted for the expensive trail of damage caused during what they describe as the biggest military hack of all time.
The legislation Britain passed in the wake of the 2001 attacks on the Twin Towers to facilitiate the extradition of terrorists to the US was a lop-sided arrangement. It allows British citizens to be seized on the basis of a warrant, while the authorities here must demonstrate they have a good case to bring an American to Britain. International recognition of an obligation to extradite or prosecute someone accused of terriorism or a serious international crime is essential. But that should not override the principle that someone accused of committing a serious international crime in or from this country should be prosecuted here.
Mrs May has indicated that British courts will have the power to bar prosecution overseas if they believe it is in the interests of justice to do so. This forum bar is a step towards common sense and, by airing the arguments in open court, should enable justice to be seen to be done. The lengthy delays as extradition cases go through the appeals system are a serious affront to justice. It has taken 10 years to decide Mr McKinnon should not be extradited, despite having Asperger's syndrome and an increasingly fragile mental state. Abu Hamza, the radical Islamist cleric and four other suspects were extradited to the US last week to face terrorism charges after appeal processes that took up to 14 years. Unsurprisingly, this was branded unacceptable by High Court judges.
One of those extradited was Babar Ahmad, a British citizen accused of raising funds for terrorism from his London home. His case is entirely different from that of Abu Hamza and prosecution would have been likely to pass the "interests of justice" test. This highlights the need for individual assessment that is also evident in the case of Richard O'Dwyer, accused of copyright offences.
The steps announced yesterday will lead to improvement but the imbalance in the standard of proof required between the US and UK cannot continue. Although Mrs May wants to transfer the power to block extradition on human rights grounds to high court judges, there is a value in the sanction being retained by the Home Secretary, who is answerable to Parliament. #
There is agreement that the process is in need of transparency and fairness but the importance of accountability must not be overlooked.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article