DECIDING when is the right time to take a child into care is the subject of a long-running debate which is renewed every time there is a tragic death involving neglect or abuse.
The balance between trying to protect youngsters from harm yet keep families together is a fine line to negotiate and mistakes will inevitably occur.
With the number of children in care in Scotland now at its highest level since the early 1980s, the state is increasingly stepping in to care for vulnerable youngsters. It is difficult to judge whether that is a positive move which will protect more children or whether authorities are now being too quick to act.
But what is clear is that just removing youngsters from a harmful situation is not enough. Looked after children are more likely to have poor life prospects and experience difficulties as adults, including homelessness, prison and mental health problems.
Much of this could arguably be attributable to traumatic experiences before the child is taken into care. But issues such as being moved around numerous different foster homes cannot help.
Yet adults with bleak prospects are not an inevitable product of the system. With the right support, many can go on to lead successful lives. Rather than debate the rights and wrongs of taking children into care, there should be more focus and discussion on how to improve the long-term outcomes for youngsters who find themselves in the system.
Going into care may one day be seen as a positive way to improve the future of children and not a last-resort which often condemns traumatised youngsters to a blighted life.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article