LET THERE be no doubt; political and economic decisions taken by those at the highest level in our society carry consequences for the physical health of individuals, especially those at the bottom of this chain.
This is beyond being a theory. And while there is undoubted stress among better-off Scots as they face tensions at work, long hours and pressures, this does not compare to the horrific, debilitating stress faced by those in the poorest section of our society, stresses which injure and kill.
It' s tough for middle class folks, but it it's a whole lot tougher for those foraging at food banks, struggling with zero hours contracts or juggling multiple minimum wage jobs.
We have known this for some time. Our former Chief Medical Officer, Sir Harry Burns, could not have been more explicit when he made the comparison to MSPs of the male life expectation of 82 in Lenzie and that of 54 just eight miles away in the East End of Glasgow.
"There is nothing intrinsically unhealthy about Scotland and the Scots," he said, citing instead the widening gulf between rich and poor. Now along comes fresh evidence from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
It concludes with a dreadful piece of jargon, which we will leave intact for the sake of accuracy: "Accelerated transmission of risk has been taking place as a direct consequence of austerity measures introduced post-2010."
The report is about "redistribution of social risk" - a technical term to explain a vile phenomenon, that while George Osborne has supposedly begun to balance his budget it was increasingly clear that we were "not in it together."
Social risk required by the bankers' follies or worse - the Financial Times suggest some may have continued to feed at the trough of public rescue funds - was never evenly spread across our society, and the consequences borne in relation to those who were to blame.
Herald readers will have suffered from this process. Our younger readers may have struggled to get a mortgage, our veterans facing the squeeze from zero interest rates, and the squeezed middle in between will have faced tough changes from pressure at work to competing demands at home.
It's been a rotten time, but for those at the bottom of the pile it has been ghastly, unimaginable. The Rowntree Foundation headline statement makes clear: "UK austerity measures impact adversely and more acutely on already disadvantaged groups and communities."
So when Sir Harry Burns told us that generations of unemployment, partial employment, uncertain hours, poverty and fear have literally killed generations of Scots, we now know that this is continuing.
The repeated phrase in the Rowntree report by Glasgow Caledonian University Researchers is "risk transfer" and "risk shift". The jargon disguises the specific: that welfare reform makes the poor poorer, and that the cumulative effect intensifies the problems.
With their jargon they make this sound like rocket science, but it's not. Risk transfer happens when public spending leads to cuts in local services, with welfare reform, with cumulative effects of these changes, and with the "deleterious impact of the risk shift on the most vulnerable groups in society."
This we already know. For our poorest, things and bad and worsening. Who is prepared to change this, to offer policies which will strike out differently? The political parties will not be falling over themselves to offer remedies in their Westminster manifestos, as these will carry price tags in the form of tax increases, but courage is required if the "risk shift to the most vulnerable" is to be reversed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article