The link between how poor a pupil is and how poorly they do in school was established a long time ago, but it is still shocking to see new evidence of the baleful impact of the link and frustrating to realise there is still precious little progress being made to improve the situation.
The new evidence is revealed today in a report from Education Scotland, which highlights the scale of the differences between pupils from deprived communities and those from more well-off areas.
Using the points assigned to every qualification in Scotland (a Higher A-grade scores 72, for example), Education Scotland's report shows pupils from the poorest backgrounds who left school in the 2011/12 season had an average of 250 points. This compares to nearly 600 for those from more affluent communities.
The fact that well-off pupils are performing so much better does not mean they are three times as bright as pupils from poorer areas or even three times as good at passing exams. It means that the profound social and economic problems faced by some children in deprived communities, particularly in Glasgow, are still, despite all the promises of comprehensive education, having a damaging impact on their prospects.
This is particularly frustrating because we know that education is one of the surest ways out of poverty, as politicians have repeatedly acknowledged. Labour made it a priority in its first Holyrood administration and, famously, Tony Blair said the word three times to underline how important he thought education was to improving the life chances of all children.
The urgent question now is how to improve matters and equip schools to help. Schools cannot do it on their own. Educational problems often begin long before school; they are deepened outside school and continue long after pupils have left; so the solutions must also reach out beyond the school gates.
The Scottish Government has done some good work in this area by alerting parents to the need to stimulate and educate pre-school children but a strategy for improvement must also involve schools engaging with deprived families much more than at present. Pilot schemes in Glasgow along these lines have shown encouraging results.
Schools must also do much better when measuring performance. Today's report shows that more than one-third of schools have weaknesses in this area and that is just not acceptable.
We need to know how badly we are doing before we can do better.
Of course, some schools are making a huge difference for children from deprived and disadvantaged communities, but the help is not sufficiently consistent. There are significant financial restraints on education budgets, but education needs to be a priority, especially for those children who need it most.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article