Can a Mrs Dawnay who lives in Devon be chief of clan Macsporran?
There is unlikely to be an emergency Cabinet meeting about that question any time soon, but it is worrying Scottish clan chiefs, who fear clan chiefships could become separated from hereditary titles (and ancient clan lands and property) if women are allowed to inherit titles on the same basis as men under new equality legislation.
Sir Malcolm MacGregor of MacGregor, convener of the Standing Council Of Scottish Chiefs, predicts a "massive jolt" to the clans system.
He warns that the new Equality (Titles) Bill, which allows for the equal succession of female heirs, will increase the risk that hereditary titles, and also castles and lands, become separated from the clan chiefships traditionally associated with them.
It is arguable whether being clan chief is a hereditary title or not, but many chieftains are also peers or baronets. Sir Malcolm asks what would happen if the eldest daughter of a clan chieftain - Macsporran, say, married a man called Dawnay, moved to Devon, and was unwilling to keep the name Macsporran? She would inherit her father's title, but could she really call herself clan chief when she did not have the right name?
If she retained the name and became chief of the Clan Macsporran, her husband might be unwilling to allow their eldest child to take the name Macsporran, which would again put the clan chiefship in doubt. Meanwhile, the ancient Macsporran castle back in Scotland would no longer be home to the clan chieftain. All in all, this increased risk of separation between chiefship and title is not in the interests of the clan system, according to Sir Malcolm.
The new law is about serving the interests of gender equality, however, and it certainly achieves that. The passing of titles only through the male line is a remarkable anachronism and its reform is long overdue. Of course, some would argue the existence of hereditary titles and peerages that are regulated by the state is in itself an anachronism, but the Equality (Titles) Bill is still progressive within its scope. Women ought to have an equal right with men to inherit titles.
The suggestion females should continue only to inherit where there is no male heir, is discriminatory. As for requiring in law that any heir to a title adopts the surname linked to it, this could force people to take names they did not want, including, presumably, individuals outside Scotland who had nothing to do with the Scottish clan system. Ultimately, it will be up to chieftains themselves to manage this situation through encouragement rather than legal coercion.
Traditional social rules about women adopting their husbands' surnames are loosening, in any case. Increasing numbers of couples double-barrel their names and it is not unheard of for men to take their wives' surnames. Many women would no doubt see the sense in retaining the clan name if they became chief, but the risk that they might not is insufficient reason to sidestep equality legislation.
While the clan chiefs' concerns are understandable, the interests of equality must come first.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article