Historians might one day tell us if the Queen did "purr", as David Cameron alleged, on hearing the result of Scotland's referendum.
The scholars could also explain if Alex Salmond's description of the monarch as a post-independence "Queen of Scots" was to her taste. We know enough: Scotland matters to the House of Windsor.
Last night the First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, was received in audience at Buckingham Palace. You can guess, given every amiable precedent set by Mr Salmond, that the two women got on well. One oddity of British life is that for 62 years the monarch has dealt best with politicians who are not, in theory, allies of royalty. Business is business.
But is Ms Sturgeon a republican at heart? You would ask in vain. Where the monarchy is concerned, the Scottish National Party leadership has raised pragmatism to a fine art. Mr Salmond, part-socialist social democrat, made sure of that during the referendum argument. If surveys are right, republicanism's best showing in Scotland has touched the 40 per cent mark. That was never good enough for a man with a plan.
It's not a small figure, however. As Ms Sturgeon takes on her duties as a Privy Councillor and prepares for a private meeting with Mr Cameron, the SNP's direction under her leadership has yet to be revealed. Those tens of thousands of new members do not seem like instinctive royalists. Within the party's vaunted internal democracy they have real power. How might they choose? How might the First Minister assert control?
Traditionally, the party hierarchy would talk long and loud about bigger fish, and how they might be fried. The Westminster balance of power and the future of the Trident missile system count as huge prizes for Ms Sturgeon. Becoming bogged down in old arguments over the nature of independence under a British monarchy could be - will be - depicted as poor tactics.
There is a sense, nevertheless, that the SNP and the wider Yes movement has unfinished business where totemic Britishness is concerned. How much independence do you desire if your leader is charming a monarch who is, arguably, the entire point and purpose of the UK? "Queen of Scots" was Mr Salmond's too-glib compromise. His party, and many Yes voters, simply agreed to postpone an argument.
Such was the collective will, expressed in September's referendum. We send the First Minister of a devolved government to the Palace, not a head of state. We decided not to break each and every old British tie, least of all with the monarchy. We chose a strange political landscape in which Ms Sturgeon can speak more easily for a majority in her country than for - on this matter at least - her party.
There are tensions still to be revealed. Ms Sturgeon might not find affable compromises as easy to manage as Mr Salmond. Those legions of new SNP members might make full use of party democracy. The connection between the Privy Council and the nuclear deterrent in the event of a hung parliament next May could keep constitutional scholars busy. The council - the fact is too little understood - is Britain's court of last resort.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article